Stroke Research - Treatment, Recovery, Rehabilitation, Signs, Symptoms

Stroke Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Stroke, including details on treatment, recovery, rehabilitation, signs, symptoms.


Stroke Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Stroke

Books on Stroke

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Severity of cerebral white matter lesions and infarcts in patients with transient or moderately disabling cerebral ischaemia: reproducibility of grading by neurologists.

De Schryver EL, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ, Algra A,

Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.deschryver@neuro.azu.nl

Diffuse or multifocal ischaemic white matter lesions increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in patients using oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin. We studied whether neurologists could reliably assess the presence of these white matter abnormalities. As part of the European/Australian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT), the severity of white matter lesions and presence of ischaemic lesions were twice assessed in a consensus meeting of three neurologists (from a pool of nine) as absent, moderate or severe, in a sample of 126 randomly selected CT or MRI scans. The neurologists were not aware of the duplicate grading. The degree of agreement between the first and second observation was calculated with kappa statistics. The kappa value for agreement between the first and second assessment of white matter lesions was 0.58 (95% CI 0.40-0.76). The kappa value for the presence of clinically relevant and/or irrelevant ischaemic lesions was 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.78). Clinicians can assess the presence of white matter lesions with sufficient reliability. Such assessment may prevent unnecessary risk with oral anticoagulation in secondary prevention after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin, of which the efficacy is currently being assessed in ESPRIT.

Published 1 August 2006 in Eur J Neurol, 13(8): 901-3.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Stroke Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Stroke Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)



Stroke Books

Brain Injury & Stroke : A handbook to recovery

Brain Injury & Stroke : A handbook to recovery