Stroke Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Stroke, including details on treatment, recovery, rehabilitation, signs, symptoms. | ||||||||
|
Gait in hemiplegia: evaluation of clinical features with the Wisconsin Gait Scale.Pizzi A, Carlucci G, Falsini C, Lunghi F, Verdesca S, Grippo A Department of Neurorehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi-ONLUS-Centro, Santa Maria agli Ulivi, Via Imprunetana 124, Florence, Italy. apizzi@dongnocchi.it OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Wisconsin Gait Scale to evaluate qualitative features of changes in hemiplegic gait in post-stroke patients. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy subjects and 56 hemiplegic outpatients, more than 12 months post-stroke, consecutively admitted in a rehabilitation centre. METHODS: Patients were videotaped while walking at a comfortable speed. Quantitative and clinical gait parameters were derived from videotaped walking tasks at admission and at the end of a period of rehabilitation training. Qualitative features were assessed using the Wisconsin Gait Scale. Functional status was rated through the modified Barthel Index. RESULTS: After training, the median Wisconsin Gait Scale score improved significantly (28 vs 26.5; p = 0.003). In particular, "weight shift to paretic side" and patterns during the swing phase of the affected leg were improved. Gait velocity (0.3 vs 0.4 m/sec; p = 0.001) and stride length (77 vs 85 cm; p = 0.0002) increased significantly, whereas number of steps (25 vs 23; p = 0.004), stride period (2.5 vs 2.3 sec; p = 0.04), and stance period (2.1 vs 2 sec; p = 0.03) of the unaffected side were reduced. The Barthel Index score increased (71 vs 78; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The Wisconsin Gait Scale is a useful tool to rate qualitative gait alterations of post-stroke hemiplegic subjects and to assess changes over time during rehabilitation training. It may be used when a targeted and standardized characterization of hemiplegic gait is needed for tailoring rehabilitation and monitoring results. Published 12 March 2007 in J Rehabil Med, 39(2): 170-4.
© 2004-2008 Stroke Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||